International Filter Co. v. Cox Bottling Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Porter, J.:
Plaintiff claimed to have sold and delivered to defendant a water filter, and brought this action to recover the purchase price of $104. The defense was that the filter was sold upon approval, with a guaranty that it would perform the work for which it was purchased, that it failed to do the work, and that *646defendant had returned it to the plaintiff and therefore owed nothing. A jury having been waived, the cause was submitted to the court. Both parties introduced evidence and the court made a general finding in favor of defendant.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago Lumber & Coal Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burnham v. BurnhamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Perkins v. Great Western Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- McLeod v. PalmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Carron v. AbounadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
- Cramer v. BrowneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.