Legal Opinion

Morganroth v. Pink

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1919No. Gen. No. 25,007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin M. Gridlbt, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holdom

A judgment was confessed on a note with cognovit in the usual form made by defendant to his own order for $9,000 with interest at 5 per cent, payable November 14, 1914. This note he indorsed and delivered to plaintiff, to secure which he executed and delivered a trust deed conveying certain real estate in Chicago, which he subsequently sold for $21,500, the deed of conveyance being made subject to the trust deed, which the grantee assumed and agreed to pay.

One Eosa Emmo obtained title by mesne conveyance and a like reservation of assumption of the trust deed incumbrance was made in the deed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scholten v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Fish v. GloverIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Elwell v. HicksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Seeman v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Albee v. GrossAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  2. Morganroth v. PinkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1922
  3. Agnell v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API