Luce Co. v. Hoefler
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Herbert and Elizabeth Hoefler, makers of the two promissory notes 2 here sued upon, appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Franklin County) awarding plaintiff The Luce Company (“the Luces”) a total of $72,971.47 plus post-judgment interest and costs. On the record of this case, we cannot overturn the Superior Court’s decision.
At trial, the Hoeflers’ only defense to the Luces’ suit upon the notes was based on a subordination agreement entered into in December, 1979, by the Luces, Maine National Bank, the Small Business Administration, and Oliver Oil Company, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Qualey v. FultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Service Auto Supply Co. Of Puerto Rico v. Harte & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Baker's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Pease v. ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bell v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Haworth v. FeigonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Fichter v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Standish Telephone Co. v. Saco River Telegraph & Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Colony Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. YerdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.