Legal Opinion

Kuehne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2003No. WD 60642PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.

Mr. Kuehne appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Mr. Kuehne of two counts of statutory rape, section 566.032, RSMo 1994, 1 and four counts of statutory sodomy, section 566.062. On appeal, Mr. Kuehne claims the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Kuehne’s basis for post-conviction relief is that his trial counsel was ineffective in several areas. First, he avers that trial counsel failed to call…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. KardeschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  4. State v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Kuehne v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API