Kuehne v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.
Mr. Kuehne appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Mr. Kuehne of two counts of statutory rape, section 566.032, RSMo 1994, 1 and four counts of statutory sodomy, section 566.062. On appeal, Mr. Kuehne claims the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Mr. Kuehne’s basis for post-conviction relief is that his trial counsel was ineffective in several areas. First, he avers that trial counsel failed to call…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mitchell v. KardeschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Daniel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
- State v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kuehne v. HoganMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.