Teets v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradfield
Plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as the department, seek reversal of the judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff Richardson for refund of moneys allegedly erroneously assessed against and paid by plaintiff to the defendant as unemployment compensation liability.
Under the circumstances here presented, a detailed statement of the facts is unnecessary*. Final disposition of the case might be had either (1) by dismissal of the writ of error because of failure of compliance with the pertinent rules of procedure, or (2) upon the merits. While we might pursue the first with…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Bennett Leasing Company v. EllisonUtah Supreme Court · 1963
- Newport Pacific Capital Co. v. WasteColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schleiger v. SchleigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Cole v. KyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- State v. Estate of FischSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.