Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Abner v. Mayfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. 90-1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We are again asked to review the commission’s order for “some evidence” supporting its decision. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment below.

The commission’s exclusive focus on perceived deficiencies in claimant’s medical evidence is misdirected. The commission mistakenly believes, as stated in its brief to this court, that temporary total disability compensation was denied because claimant did not “provide probative and substantial evidence in support of her claim.” This is not, however, what the order said. The order stated that temporary total disability compensation was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Lampkins v. Dayton Malleable, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Knapp v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State Findlay Ind. v. Ind. Commission of Oh., 08ap-584 (5-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Heilman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API