Legal Opinion
Charlton v. Brown
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 15, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Andrew Circuit Court. cited Tyler Eject. 513-14 ; Vanderpool v. Van Valkenburgh, 6 N. Y. 190; Morris v. Keys, 1 Hill, 540; Caw v. Robertson, 5-N. Y. 125; Hill v. Crockford, 24 N Y. 128.
1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge
The plaintiff claims the land in controversy from Thomas Rodgers, the original patentee, through his will devising the same to his son Allen G. Rodgers; and the action of the court in admitting in evidence the record of said will, is claimed to have been erroneous. The present probate judge of the county produced upon the stand and identified the record-book of wills belonging to his office, which contained a record of said will, duly executed and attested, together with the following certificates:
“ State oe Missouri, ) , , n ^ „ ’ > ss. Andrew County Court. County of Andrew. )
“November…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hill v. . CrockfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
3Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. EstesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
- Fenderson v. Missouri Tie & Timber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1904