Legal Opinion

Schuett v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 25, 2007No. 2006AP3014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunner, J.

¶ 1. Richard Hanson, Jr., appeals a default judgment rendered against him after he failed to timely answer an amended complaint. Hanson argues he had no obligation to answer the amended complaint because it was not filed within six months of the original complaint and was therefore untimely pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 802.09(1). He also argues that a default judgment was unavailable because he joined issue when he answered the original complaint. Finally, he contends the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when rejecting Hanson's argument that his failure to answer was the result…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Garcia v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Holman v. Family Health PlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kroeplin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  5. Bell v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ten Mile Investments, LLC v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  2. Argos Utilities Corp. v. PerrinRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API