Frederickson v. Luedtke Construction Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOX, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit in admiralty for damages stemming from an illness allegedly incurred while he served as captain of the tug “Ray Durocher.” The vessel was owned by defendant Durocher & Van Antwerp, Inc. and chartered by Luedtke Con struction Co. The question before me at this time is whether defendants are entitled to a jury trial, which they have demanded, or whether plaintiff’s motion to strike the jury demand must be granted.
The relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1873, provides:
“In any case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction relating to any matter of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stoddard v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Washington International Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988