Katz v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentNye, Chief Justice
The original dissent filed in this case is withdrawn and the following dissent is substituted therefor.
I respectfully dissent because the judgment of the trial court cannot be upheld for the reasons that plaintiffs did not prove either a superior title in themselves or the wrongful cloud on that title in the defendant.
The defendant obtained a general warranty deed from the Nycum Gin Company, Inc., a Texas corporation, which conveyed to him by metes and bounds, a tract of land out of Block 33 in a subdivision of Rio Hondo Park Townsite located on the Arroyo, Colorado in Cameron County, Texas,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Lorino v. Crawford Packing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- Texan Development Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Lee v. GrupeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.