Legal Opinion · Dissent

Katz v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1978No. 1230Published

1DissentNye, Chief Justice

The original dissent filed in this case is withdrawn and the following dissent is substituted therefor.

I respectfully dissent because the judgment of the trial court cannot be upheld for the reasons that plaintiffs did not prove either a superior title in themselves or the wrongful cloud on that title in the defendant.

The defendant obtained a general warranty deed from the Nycum Gin Company, Inc., a Texas corporation, which conveyed to him by metes and bounds, a tract of land out of Block 33 in a subdivision of Rio Hondo Park Townsite located on the Arroyo, Colorado in Cameron County, Texas,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Lorino v. Crawford Packing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Texan Development Co. v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Lee v. GrupeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API