Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Emery v. Wal-Mart Super Center No. 576

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1999No. 92,257, 92,258Published

1Concurrence

ADAMS, J.:

concurring by reason of stare decisis.

" 1 I agree that as to his back claim Claimant's testimony contains no inherent probabilities or contradictions and that the record otherwise contains no evidence of other circumstances which would justify an inference that Claimant's testimony is false. Accordingly, I am forced to conclude under Hughes v. Cole Grain Co., 1998 OK 76, 964 P.2d 206, and more recently what might be characterized as dicta in Tolbert v. Eastern Contracting, Inc., 1999 OK 23, 978 P.2d 358 that the Workers' Compensation Court was not free to find Claimant's evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Cole Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Tolbert v. Eastern Contracting Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API