City of Woodstock v. Boddy
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Undercofler, Presiding Justice.
The City of Woodstock appeals an order granting a permanent injunction to appellee. It claims the trial court erred in ruling that the definition of "mobile home” in its new comprehensive zoning ordinance was vague, indefinite, uncertain and constitutionally unenforceable. We affirm.
The zoning ordinance establishes six zoning districts and in three of these prohibits the use of mobile homes as single family residences. Article III of the ordinance defines a mobile home as a "vehicle or portable structure used for dwelling or sleeping purposes.” On October 18,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- White v. LegodaisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Schwartz v. McAteeOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Town of Helena v. Country Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980