Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Georgian Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1918No. 9753PublishedCited by 5 opinions

'Complaint; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. March 5, 1918..

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. Where parties sign a bond as guarantors, they can not set up, by way of defense to a suit thereon, that the instrument was executed by reason of a contemporaneous parol understanding with the principal debtor that they were not to be bound,, and for a purpose *708wholly at variance with its plain tenor and import, as this would in effect be merely adding to and varying the terms of a written contract, by parol evidence. Civil Code, §§ 4268, 5788; Hirsch v. Oliver, 91 Ga. 554 (2), 560 (18 S. E. 354); Connor v. Lasseter, 98 Ga. 708 (25 S. E. 830); Capps v. Edwards, 130 Ga. 146 (4), 150 (60 S. E.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Hirsch v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Capps v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Swift v. Oglesby & SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Biggers v. Equitable Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Equitable Credit Corp. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Rogers v. ManningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  3. Haygood v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Chestnutt v. BittickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Constitution Publishing Co. v. GammonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API