Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2010No. 39S01-0907-CR-309PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

The trial court declared a mistrial after interviewing jurors regarding their exposure to a newspaper article reporting a letter written by the defendant to the prosecution. The Court of Appeals reversed the defendant's conviction by a newly impaneled jury. The Court of Appeals found insufficient grounds to discharge the earlier jury, and therefore ruled the trial by the new jury violated the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. We hold that the trial court's determination of the need to discharge the earlier jury is entitled to deference and was not an abuse of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. McHenry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Troy Shaw v. Bill WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Anthony D. Gorman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Nathan Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Casady v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Commitment of S.T. v. Community Hospital NorthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API