Legal Opinion

Delahanty v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 11, 1990No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion to correct a judgment entered in accordance with an arbitration award on the grounds that it erroneously included an award of *1165prejudgment interest. Defendants also sought restitution for the interest portion of the judgment which they had allegedly satisfied by mistake. A judgment which is paid and satisfied of record ceases to have any existence since a defendant, by paying the amount due, extinguishes the judgment and the obligation thereunder (H.D.I. Diamonds v Frederick Modell, Inc., 86…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. H. D. I. Diamonds, Inc. v. Frederick Modell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Samuel v. SamuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Cach, LLC v. RyanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
  3. Delahanty v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Valtech Research, Inc. v. Meridian Abstract Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API