Legal Opinion

Lifshutz v. Citizens & Southern National Bank of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 22, 1993No. 93-0945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam 1

We grant'this petition for writ of certiorari and quash that part of the trial court order granting the Respondent-Plaintiffs motion to compel, to the extent that the order rejects Petitioners’ claim of privilege based on work product. The objections are to the production of certain notes, memos, and other investigative material, and to related testimony by Petitioners’ investigator-consultant. Alachua Gen. Hosp. v. Zimmer USA, Inc., 403 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Shawmut Van Lines, Inc. v. Small, 148 So.2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). See also Vann v. State, 85 So.2d 133 (Fla.1956). With…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Vann v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  4. Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Turtle Reef Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Procter & Gamble Co. v. SwilleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. NAT. CAR RENTAL SYS. v. KosakowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. ICI Explosives USA Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API