In the Interest of T. P.

Phipps, Judge.

This is a continuation of In the Interest of D. P.1 where we reversed a juvenile court order finding two children to be deprived, because the findings of deprivation were based primarily on evidence received at an untranscribed and apparently unreported detention hearing. After conducting another hearing on remand, the court entered a new order finding that the children continue to be deprived. The father appeals that order. Because the evidence of record supports that finding, we affirm.

D. P. was the father’s appeal of a June 2006 order of the Juvenile Court of Murray County…