Legal Opinion

Merrick v. Hill

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Monroe county court. Action by Mary W. Merrick, as executrix of the will of Melzer F. Merrick, deceased, against Sarah J. Hill and Frederick Zimmer, for rent. From a judgment of the county court affirming a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Rochester in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed-.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to recover the sum of $130, being the amount of rent due upon a lease of real estate. On April 1, 1890, Moses Merrick leased to one Edward P. Hill certain premises in the city of Rochester and town of Gates, for one year next ensuing, at the annual rental of $215, payable quarterly on the 1st days of July, October, January, and April. Indorsed upon the lease is the following: “For value received, we do hereby guaranty the payment of rent of the foregoing premises as hereinbefore agreed to be paid by said lessee, Edward P. Hill;” dated Rochester, April' 1, 1890, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People v. . VilasNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Lane v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deutschmann v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Deutschmann v. Third Avenue RailroadsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Ten Eyck v. LombardNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API