Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Allen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1984No. 53173Published

1DissentChief Justice Ryan

I fear that the majority opinion establishes the proposition that one can enhance the probability of having his conviction reversed if he persists in obdurate obstructionist tactics. If there were the slightest chance that the defendant was not sane when the offense was committed, or that he was not competent at the time the guilty plea was entered, I would vote to reverse the conviction. Under the facts of this case, however, I find no reason to do other than to affirm the judgment of the trial court. As will be discussed later, the majority opinion omits any reference to that part of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. MylesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. The PEOPLE v. MilliganIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. BrittonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API