Legal Opinion
Lift Truck Parts & Service, Inc. v. Bourne
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.
Defendants Bourne appeal from a decree which enjoins them from conducting business under the assumed name of “Lift Parts Service of Oregon”' or “any name so similar to Lift Truck Parts & Service, Inc., as to cause confusion.” . . .
The defendant Pacific Northwest Bell .Telephone Company having agreed to abide by any decree . of the court, the suit was dismissed as to it, and it., took no part in this appeal.
The decree of the trial court is challenged on two points. First it is argued that the plaintiff’s name; “Lift Truck Parts & Service, Inc.,” is simply a description of a type of business…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Squeezit Corp. v. Plastic Dispensers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- The 88% STORES, INC. v. MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Household Finance Corp. v. Federal Finance Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1952
3Cited by11 opinions
- Norm Thompson Outfitters, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- American Scientific Chemical, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Cooperativa de Cafeteros de Puerto Rico v. Colón ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1964
- Frostig v. Saga Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Classic Instruments, Inc. v. VDO-Argo Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.