Legal Opinion

Everett & Son v. Ferst's Sons & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Brannen. City court of Statesboro. January 30, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. The expression “return day,” as used in the act of 1900 amending the Civil Code, § 3667 (Acts 1900, p. 53; Van Epps’ Code Supp. § 6185), means the same as “filing day,” or the last day on which suits may be filed so as to be returnable to the next term. Baxley v. Bennett, 38 Ga. 146; Hood v. Powers, 57 Ga. 245.

2. Consequently where the undisputed evidence showed that written notice was given, as provided in said section, by the holder of certain promissory notes which contained obligations to pay attorney’s fees, of the holder’s intention to sue and of the term of court to which suit would…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mount Vernon Bank v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Watters & Co. v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Davenport v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API