Legal Opinion

Noonan v. McNab

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwaukee County. Appeal from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the complaint. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The main purpose of this action seems to be to rescind and set aside sales and transfers made by the defendant, McNab, of his share or interest in the property and assets of the firm of Noonan & McNab, which it is alleged he has made to his co-defendant, Orton, and further to compel McNab to specifically perform a certain covenant in the articles of co-partnership of Noonan & McNab, in and by which he agreed not to sell his share or interest in the property of the firm, *278without tbe consent in writing of tbe plaintiff first being obtained. It appears from tbe statements made in tbe complaint,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lockwood v. ReeseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Merrick v. Merchants National BankLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API