Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dawson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 1, 1850PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Louisville Chancery Court.- Limitation. Partnership.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

The account of the steamer Nautilus against Richard P. Smith, set up in the bill of Dawson, and of which he claims one-fourth, seems to have been commenced while said Smith and Dawson were joint owners, the latter owning one-fourth of the boat. It appears, however, to have been continued, as an account current or open account, after. R, P, Smith sold his interest of three-fourths to Wm. H. Smith on the 29th of March, 1842. And on the 14th May, 1843, which was nearly one month after the last charge, and-nearly two months after the last credit, a balance seems to have been struck and the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marcum's Admx. v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Sprogle v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  3. King Iron Bridge & Manuf'g Co. v. County of OtoeUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  4. Courson's Executors v. CoursonOhio Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API