Smith v. Dawson
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Error to the Louisville Chancery Court.- Limitation. Partnership.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall
The account of the steamer Nautilus against Richard P. Smith, set up in the bill of Dawson, and of which he claims one-fourth, seems to have been commenced while said Smith and Dawson were joint owners, the latter owning one-fourth of the boat. It appears, however, to have been continued, as an account current or open account, after. R, P, Smith sold his interest of three-fourths to Wm. H. Smith on the 29th of March, 1842. And on the 14th May, 1843, which was nearly one month after the last charge, and-nearly two months after the last credit, a balance seems to have been struck and the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Marcum's Admx. v. TerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Sprogle v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- King Iron Bridge & Manuf'g Co. v. County of OtoeUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
- Courson's Executors v. CoursonOhio Supreme Court · 1869