Legal Opinion

State v. Workman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1992No. 15730PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Patrick L. Workman, appeals his conviction for felonious assault, R.C. 2903.11(A)(2). For the reasons that follow, we reject Workman’s claim that there was not sufficient evidence supporting his conviction.

On December 20, 1991, Workman was indicted on two counts of rape and one count each of kidnapping, felonious assault, assault and aggravated menacing. During the course of the trial, the court granted Workman’s Crim.R. 29 motion for acquittal on the assault and aggravated menacing charges. Thereafter, the jury returned a guilty verdict on the singular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrooksOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KlineOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. HardinOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zulock v. ShuresCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  2. State v. TribbleOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. BoothOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. CathelOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. FigueroaOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API