Legal Opinion

People v. Grosfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), dated March 7, 2006, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In 1996 the defendant was designated a level three sex offender pursuant to a risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders. The order appealed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. People v. AbdullahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. CarltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. People v. MollenkopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. DililloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. People v. JonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API