Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Donohue

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 22, 1990No. ACM 28220Published

1ConcurrenceBlommers, Senior Judge

I foresee the possibility that situations could arise where a totally inelastic application of the provisions contained in paragraph 13-4b(1)(b) of AFR 111-1 would completely elevate form over substance. Cf. United States v. Jette, 25 M.J. 16 (C.M.A.1987); United States v. Dorsey, 25 M.J. 728, 730 (A.F.C.M.R.1987) (Blommers, S.J. dissenting).

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. JetteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. DorseyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987