Legal Opinion

Sherwood Estates Homes Ass'n v. McConnell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1986No. WD 37014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a civil action involving the construction of a restrictive covenant. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellants present a sole point which charges the trial court erred in finding that certain restrictions relevant to sub-division construction applied to the erection of appellants’ dog pen because such pen was not the sort of “other structure” the regulation of which was contemplated by the developers in that a strict construction, as required by law, shows an intent to restrict only major construction and not minor additions to the landscape.

This cause was tried to the court upon a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Easy Living Mobile Manor, Inc. v. Eureka Fire Protection DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Paddock Forest Residents Ass'n v. Ladue Service Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Lake Saint Louis Community Association v. KamperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Sherwood Estates Homes Ass'n v. SchmidtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Caniglia v. Nigro Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. SpavaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. The Lake at Twelve Oaks Homes Association, Inc., A Missouri Not-For-Profit Corporation v. Matthew Scott Hausman, Individually and Stacey Jo Hausman, Trustee of the Hausman Revocable Trust Dated 5/5/1999Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Leonards v. U-Jin Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Pringle v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API