United States v. One 1963 Cadillac Hardtop
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
The United States of America initiated a libel proceeding against a certain 1963 Cadillac, seeking its forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of Title 49, Section 782, of the United States Code of Laws. Claimant has moved this court to suppress certain evidence alleged to have been illegally seized. On August 29, 1963 (220 F.Supp. 841), this court decided that a civil forfeiture proceeding is in the nature of a criminal sanction, and therefore a motion to suppress may be brought as in a criminal prosecution.
On February 10, 1963, at approximately 7:50 A.M., Officer John…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Willie Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Duncantell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Aldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.