Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1963 Cadillac Hardtop

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 13, 1963No. 63-C-92PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

The United States of America initiated a libel proceeding against a certain 1963 Cadillac, seeking its forfeiture pursuant to the provisions of Title 49, Section 782, of the United States Code of Laws. Claimant has moved this court to suppress certain evidence alleged to have been illegally seized. On August 29, 1963 (220 F.Supp. 841), this court decided that a civil forfeiture proceeding is in the nature of a criminal sanction, and therefore a motion to suppress may be brought as in a criminal prosecution.

On February 10, 1963, at approximately 7:50 A.M., Officer John…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. Willie Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. DussellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Duncantell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API