Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Samuel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 16, 2009No. 4-08-0708PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Appleton

Contemnor-appellant, attorney Samuel J. Cahnman, was found guilty of indirect criminal contempt during postjudgment dissolution of marriage proceedings. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified.

I. BACKGROUND

A judgment of dissolution of marriage between David and Jeanne Samuel set forth certain financial obligations of David Samuel. David, a physician, had moved to Louisiana and, after Hurricane Katrina, was suffering financially, which caused him to file a petition for relief from those obligations. His petition was not heard by the trial court.

In 2007,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of BettsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. People v. JavarasIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Marcisz v. MarciszIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. TomashevskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lapp v. Village of WinnetkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Marriage of SamuelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API