Legal Opinion

Creden v. Central R.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1940No. 653PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant, in a personal injury action, to vacate or modi*169fy interrogatories propounded to the defendant by the plaintiffs under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

Interrogatories 1, 2 and 3 deal with the time of the report to the defendant of the accident and by whom and to whom made. As such they deal with important background which may bear upon, among other things, the bona fides of plaintiffs’ claim. They are relevant and are allowed.

Interrogatories 4, 5 and 7 seek to ascertain the names of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. PalmerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  2. Olson v. New York Cent. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1940

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Byers Theaters, Inc. v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. West Virginia · 1940
  3. Ryan v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  4. Piorkowski v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Conneway v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API