State v. Illig-Renn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Defendant demurred to a charge of violating ORS 162.247(l)(b). Under that statute, “[a] person commits the crime of interfering with a peace officer if the person, knowing that another person is a peace officer * * * [r]efuses to obey a lawful order by the peace officer.” The trial court allowed the demurrer, agreeing with defendant’s argument that the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague. We reversed and remanded, relying primarily on State v. Ausmus, 178 Or App 321, 37 P3d 1024 (2001), a case that the Supreme Court had already agreed to review but had not yet decided. State v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. ChakerianOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. AusmusOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ComptonOregon Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BabsonOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. Illig-RennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. NeretinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.