Legal Opinion

Dees v. Metts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 3, 1944No. 1 Div. 186PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

This cause was originally assigned to Mr. Justice BOULDIN. Upon consideration of his opinion by the Court in Division consultation, the writer prepared the following opinion in dissent thereto. And upon further consideration of the cause by the whole Court, the conclusion reached by this dissenting opinion met the approval of the majority and here controls the result. Justice STAKELY concurs in the following opinion in its entirety. Justices BROWN and LIVINGSTON limit their concurrence as indicated in the separate concurring view written by Justice BROWN and found…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bancroft v. OtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  3. Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Eastis v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Allen v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. ViceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Mindler v. CrockerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Reed v. ShippSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Johnson v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Locke v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API