Reece v. Selmonosky
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Elvin Reece brought this action against Carlos Selmonosky, M. D. and James Blank, M. D. under theories of negligence and breach of contract seeking damages allegedly resulting from surgery. The jury returned a verdict in favor of both doctors and Reece appeals.
1. Appellant contends the trial court erred by granting appellees’ motion in limine precluding appellant from presenting evidence on the issue of whether appellant’s consent to the surgical procedure was informed consent. Likewise, appellant contends the trial court erred by denying his motion for a new trial on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyles v. CockrillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Simpson v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Keno v. Alside, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Seabolt v. CheesboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Jackson v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mag Mutual Insurance v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. FischerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Deloitte Haskins & Sells v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Rta Strategy, LLC v. Silver Comet Terminal Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Frey v. Sinkola, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.