Legal Opinion
House of Pasta, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 24, 1978No. Appeal, No. 152 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
At issue are cross motions by the Commonwealth to quash a petition for review and by petitioner for leave to file a more specific petition for review.
Considering itself aggrieved by a reassessment of sales and use tax made against it by the Board of Finance and Revenue (Board), the House of Pasta, Inc., on January 25, 1978, submitted an “appeal” to this Court and was advised that tax appeals were subject to the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure (Rules) requiring the appeal to be in the form of a petition for review. Petitioner promptly resubmitted a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Philadelphia Gas WorksCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Hazleton National Bank v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Tyson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- J. L. Turner Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In Re: ORDER AMENDING RULES 1901.3, 1901.6, 1905, 1910.4, 1910.7, 1910.11, 1910.27, 1915.3, 1915.4-4, 1915.7, 1915.15, 1915.17, 1915.18, 1920.13, 1920.15, 1920.31, 1920.33, 1920.75, 1930.1, 1930.6, 1953, AND 1959 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In Re: Order Amending Rules 102, 105, 120, 121, 301, 313, 341, 502, 553, 701, 702, 901, 1311, 1312, 1316, 1323, 1501-1504, 1511-1517, 1531, 1532, 1541-1543, 1551, 1561, 1571, 1573, 1701, 1702, 1704, 1762, 1770, 1781, 1911, 2702, 3307, 3331 & Adopting RuleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.