Legal Opinion

Vlahos v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 11, 1990No. 1-89-2100PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon

Plaintiff, George Vlahos, brought this action against defendant, City of Chicago, to recover for injuries he sustained when he stepped into the street and fell. Plaintiff was not walking within a crosswalk when he fell. Plaintiff alleged that defendant had torn up the street to repair water pipes and completed those repairs three months earlier, but neglected to finish the street repairs, leaving a large hole. As plaintiff stepped off the curb onto the street to proceed to the driver’s side of his truck, which was double-parked, he was injured.

Defendant moved for summary judgment on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Di Domenico v. Village of RomeovilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  2. Risner v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Mason v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Crutchfield v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Curatola v. Village of NilesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Vaughn v. City of West FrankfortIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sisk v. Williamson CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Torres v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Greene v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API