Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 1989No. 87-1349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

The City Council of Rainbow City, Alabama (“the Council”), appeals an order of the circuit court directing the issuance of a writ of mandamus requiring the Council to vote on the appellees’ petition to rezone 40 acres of land from a residential (R-l) classification to an agricultural (AG) classification. We reverse and remand.

In 1981, Rainbow City annexed 40 acres of land. The 40 acres was automatically zoned R-l, because the zoning ordinance did not provide an AG classification. Prior to annexation, the land had been used for raising cattle and hogs. In 1982, the appel-lees,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Episcopal Foundation of Jefferson County v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. City of Mobile v. KaraganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Harris v. Jefferson County Board of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  3. Ex Parte MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API