Legal Opinion

James v. Pike County

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2001No. 63A01-0106-JV-237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Valerie M. James brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of her motion to dismiss Pike County Office of Family and Children's ("OFC") petition to terminate her parental rights. She presents four issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Whether Indiana Code Section 31-35-2-4.5 violates federal law.

2. Whether the statute violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

3. Whether the current version of the statute applies here.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Jam…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Morse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Phelps v. SybinskyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Belvedere v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Elizabethe G. v. Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Belvedere v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API