Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Nabors

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepstor

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss this writ of error, or in the alternative to strike it on two grounds: First, that there is no motion for a new trial of record in the cause, and second, that there is no prayer for an appeal, nor is there an order granting an appeal on file in the record in this cause.

This motion must be overruled for the reason first, that the alleged error is asserted to be apparent on the face of the technical record in'which case a motion for a new trial is not a prerequisite to the removal of the case to the Appellate Court (See: — Güreath’s ed., Caruthers’…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chumbley v. Duck River Electric Membership Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API