Legal Opinion

United States v. Foster

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 2, 1913No. 641PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Harold A. Foster and others were indicted for conspiring to defraud the United States. On demurrer to the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

MORTON, District Judge.

The first count of this indictment charges the defendants with having conspired to defraud the United States. The alleged object of the conspiracy was to obtain for the defendant Foster a larger salary as postmaster at North Brookfield than he was, by law and by the regulations of the Post Office Department, entitled to. This object was to be accomplished, according to the allegations of the indictment, in the following manner: One of the other defendants, Winchell, was to buy at the North Brookfield post office large quantities of stamps, which he was to send to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. United States v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API