Wilson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MCFADDEN, Judge.
Somora Wilson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his plea in bar on speedy trial grounds. We pretermit the threshold question, whether the relevant delay, eleven months and ten days, was long enough to be presumptively prejudicial and to trigger an inquiry under Barker v. Wingo, 407 U. S. 514 (92 SC 2182, 33 LE2d 101) (1972). See State v. Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 675 (2) (a) (706 SE2d 561) (2011) (“A delay approaching one year is generally deemed to be presumptively prejudicial.”). We hold, as did the trial court, that Wilson has not met his burden under the four-factor…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Nelloms v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. Holly JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- State v. Logan Adam BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021