Legal Opinion

Inspired Capital, LLC v. Condé Nast

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 6, 2017No. 17-0547PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, C.J.

The plaintiffs below, Inspired Capital, LLC, and Erica Gary, derivatively on behalf of Inspired Food Solutions, LLC, appeal from a non-final order dismissing their first amended complaint against defendants Condé Nast and FremantleMedia North America, Inc. (“Fremantle”) based on a forum selection clause contained in a License Agreement. Because the forum selection clause is mandatory and the claims asserted against Condé Nast and Freman-tle are “relating to” the License Agreement, we affirm.

Condé Nast, as licensor, Inspired Foods Solutions, LLC, as licensee, and Fremantle, as Condé Nast’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Shakespeare Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Fairbanks Contracting And Remodeling, Inc. v. Anthony R. Hopcroft and Mary J. HopcroftDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Columbia Aircraft Sales, Inc v. Piper Aircraft, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  2. Oktex Utility Construction, Inc. v. MASTEC North America IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  3. Summit Aviation, Inc. v. MSP Recovery Aviation, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  4. WEST BAY PLAZA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. SIKA CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API