Legal Opinion

Rock v. Gustaveson Oil Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1922No. 3660PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by Murray Rock against tbe Gustaveson Oil Company. Judgment of dismissal was entered, new trial was refused, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him by reason of the defendant’s failure to make timely delivery of certain shares of its capital stock purchased by him in accordance with the terms and conditions of an agreement of sale.

In conformity with the pleadings of the respective parties, the district court upon a trial of the case denied a recovery, and from the evidence found the facts to be substantially as follows:

“That the defendant, in consideration of the plaintiff’s subscription for certain stock in the defendant corporation, gave the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spiers v. . Halstead, Haines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Coray v. Perry Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Whalon v. AldrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  4. Makris v. MelisUtah Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FerrellUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  3. Rock v. Gustaveson Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Rock v. Gustaveson Oil Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Van Noy v. GibbsUtah Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API