Legal Opinion
Mills v. Allegiance Healthcare Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 16, 2001No. 01 CV-10582 PBSPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SARIS, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Charles Mills alleges that he contracted an allergy to latex as a result of his use of, and exposure to, latex rubber gloves manufactured and/or distributed by the fifteen defendants including The Claf-lin Company (“Claflin”). The complaint, which was amended prior to removal, sets forth four state law claims: negligence (Count I), breach of warranty (Count II), loss of consortium (Count III), and violation of Chapter 93A (Count IV).
After all the defendants removed the action to this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a), 1446, Plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- In Re New England Mutual Life Insurance Co. Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Phillips v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- In Re Pharmaceutical Ind. Aver. Whole. Price Lit.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- In Re Massachusetts Diet Drug LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.