State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Walmsley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1ConcurrenceO'Niell, Chief Justice
Since a majority of the members of the court have concluded that the state had a sufficient interest to bring this suit, and that the Attorney General had the right to sue on behalf of the bondholders and taxpayers of the city of New Orleans, I concur in the ruling that Judge .Byrnes was right in granting the preliminary injunction. I, doubt that the ruling that the state has a sufficient interest to bring the suit is in accord with the rulings rendered by this court in State v. C. S. Jackson & Co., 137 La. 931, 69 So. 751, and Saint v. Allen, 172 La. 350, 134 So. 246; and I doubt that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- State ex rel. Saunders v. KohnkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- State v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Saint v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.