Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Stacker

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 10, 1958No. 46580PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

The origin of this cause was that on November 21, 1956, Kenneth D. Anderson instituted an action against Bertha Stacker “a/k/a” (meaning, presumably, “also known as”) Ber.tha E. Anderson. He denominated his action a “Suit In Partition.” In his petition he alleged that “plaintiff and defendant were contemplating marriage, but never did marry,” but, in the course of their engagement, plaintiff acquired the property known as 4762 North-land Avenue “and in contemplation of said marriage, caused title to said property to be vested in the name of Kenneth B. Anderson and Bertha…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  2. West v. KnowlesWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Perrin v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  4. Collins v. NorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Merit v. LoseyOregon Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brooks v. KunzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Thomas v. LloydMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Clark v. DadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Hoit v. RankinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Brooks v. KunzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API