Legal Opinion

City of Albany v. Lee

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed for reasons set forth in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. To this we but add the observation that, in the application of this ordinance to the appellant, “The Constitution * * * does not require impossible standards; it is enough that the language used ‘ “conveys sufficiently definite warnings as to the proscribed conduct when measured by com*635mon understanding and practices” ’ ” (People v Illardo, 48 NY2d 408, 414, quoting Miller v California, 413 US 15, 27-28, n 10).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. People v. IllardoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Lee v. Zoning Board of Appeals of BethlehemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Allies Boulevard Bookstore, Inc. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Palin v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API