Legal Opinion

Ardolino v. Merrill

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 8, 2003No. 02-2055Published

1Per curiam

Robert Ardolino appeals from the district court’s judgment accepting Magistrate Judge Cohen’s recommendation that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. But in doing so, Ardolino has made no effort to identify error in the magistrate judge’s cogent and comprehensive analysis, which is set forth in a published opinion. See 223 F.Supp.2d 215 (D.Me.2002). Indeed, Ardolino’s appellate brief is nothing more than a slightly modified rehash of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The availability of de novo appellate review of a district court’s legal conclusions, see Almanzar v. Maloney, 281…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Corrada Betances v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. John J. Maguire, United States v. Thomas M. Kavanagh, United States v. Robert A. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Almanzar v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  5. Ardolino v. Warden, Maine State PrisonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API