Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Mill Owners Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 23, 1942No. 6 Div. 983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks to review certain rulings of that court on pleadings, having taken a non-suit by reason of those adverse rulings.

Considering them in the order as argued by counsel, we note that count 1, to which demurrer was sustained, is not different from count A, to which demurrer was overruled, so that there was no prejudice to appellant by such ruling.

Count C, to which demurrer was sustained, claims for the damage to “one sewing machine and certain groceries situated” in a dwelling house, which defendant insured against loss or injury by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Assurance Co. v. Hall & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Headley v. &198tna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Hall & Brother v. Western Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Western Assurance Co. v. Hall & BrotherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jersey Ins. Co. v. RoddamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  2. Jersey Ins. Co. v. RoddamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  3. Jersey Ins. Co. v. RoddamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Sims v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Sims v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API