Legal Opinion

People v. Lescallett

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 4, 1981No. Crim. 21360PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, Acting P. J.

A jury found defendant Darrell Lescallett, Jr., guilty of robbery. He appeals from the judgment which was entered upon the jury’s verdict.

We affirm the judgment for reasons which follow.

The several appellate contentions are stated as they are phrased by Lescallett.

I

Contention: “The evidence of the ‘force or fear’ element of robbery is legally insufficient to support appellant’s conviction of that crime.”

The offense which was proved to the jury’s satisfaction may be described as a “purse-snatching.” The case had been given to the jury on the theory of grand theft…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. JimenezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. People v. SirhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. BeardsleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. AllisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API