Legal Opinion

Pitchfork Land and Cattle Company v. King

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1961No. A-7929PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

Respondents, Raymond King and a number of other farmers and landowners, brought this suit against Pitchfork Land and Cattle.Company and Aerial Sprayers, Inc. for damages to their growing crops of cotton allegedly caused from herbicide effect. They alleged negligence on the part of both Pitchfork and the Aerial Sprayers in allowing herbicide chemicals to drift and settle upon their crops from spraying operations conducted on Pitchfork’s land.

A jury verdict favorable to King and others was returned and judgment against both defendants entered thereon. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coxson v. Atlanta Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. SouthardTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Dave Lehr, Inc. v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Norton v. Day Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Limestone Products Distribution, Inc. v. McNamaraTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. General Electric Co. v. MoritzTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  4. Ross v. Texas One Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  5. Dougherty v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API